Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Neo-Puritan Observer's avatar

Really appreciated this piece — especially the clarity in dismantling the idea that randomness equals freedom. I’d be curious to hear your thoughts on a different angle: have you considered approaching this from an epistemological rather than causal framework?

In other words, instead of asking what causes a choice, what if the more foundational question is what constitutes a choice — that is, what makes it intelligible as a rational act in the first place?

Freedom might not rest in the chain of causation behind a choice, but in the agent’s rationale — in how he perceives and weighs competing goods. This reframes the issue away from determinism vs. indeterminism, and toward the nature of deliberation itself.

Would love your take on that.

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Randomness does not exists.

Expand full comment

No posts